Sunday, April 7, 2019

Practice Question for Phl264 Essay Example for Free

utilisation Question for Phl264 EssayInfo- the test is 90 mins, you must answer 5 questions, and at least 1 from each section. (Thats 18 mins for each question) There is 1 question from each weeks material. Its a good idea to practise writing by hand so you jockey how much you can write in 18 mins. Section A 1 What, according to calamus singer, is an ultimate choice? How do ultimate choices conflict with other choices? How do you call we should choose when face up with an ultimate choice? 2 What is the distinction between top down, bottom up and reflective counterbalance reasoning?What do you think is the most appropriate form of reasoning and why? 3 Do you agree with Milton Friedman that a managers primary obligation is to increase profits in congruity with the law (firstly, explain Friedmans view) 4. According to the stakeholder view of business ethics, managers have a broad make out of obligations to different stakeholder groups. Explain and evaluate this view. Sectio n B 1 Does advertising violate autonomy? (For a question like this, it is best to firstly discuss the views of theorists in class, e. g.Arrington and/or Lippke, then discuss what you think in a critical way) 2 Do business have responsibilities to protect the environment? (same as above, regarding Des Jardins, Bullard etc. ) 3 What is affirmative action, and is it a type of reverse discrimination? Can AA and/or reverse discrimination be reassert? 4 How do corporations twist the government? Is such influence justified? Section C 1 Pogge argues that we are obligated to help the poor in 3rd world countries because we are partially responsible for their plight.Explain and evaluate this view (Note- the 2 outlet this week are globalisation and sweatshop labour- the question could be on either of these topics) 2. What are some of the honourable problems of gift giving in the pharmaceutical industry? Do you think give giving have to be restricted? Why and in what way? 3 Kultgen argues t hat professional codes unfairly elevate the billet of the professions to afford professionals higher social status, pay and power. Do you agree? 4 In what situations is whistleblowing morally justified? Is whistle blowing ever morally obligatory?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.