The singer solution to world poverty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The singer solution to world poverty - Essay sampleFor this reason, the paper will dwell on the possible and unreasonable solutions stated by Peter Singer as a solution for world poverty. In brief, Singer believes that a soulfulnesss action will be judged by its result. As a utilitarian philosopher, he believes that Dora did the right thing in deciding to get the child back. In this manner, the moral issue here is that Dora was haunted by the fact the she was able to see the child, which caused her to feel guilty of her actions. own(prenominal) interaction was the most dominant difference between Dora and an American who will be donating. However, Singer cited that if an American chose to donate $200 to charity rather than spend it on unnecessary things, he or she will be able to save five children from dying. In a personal level, the line of work of Singer in act donating is agreeable because the expected result would be saving at most five lives of children in poverty. In an average, $200 is a little meat of money to spare in dress to help other people, peculiarly a child, to live. It is inevitable to be persuaded by Singer in this pull up stakes of his argument especially in knowing that this amount will be sufficient for four years to help a sickly child be ruddy when he or she comes to the age of six. As a person, Singers argument holds much more than the consequences of a persons action. It exemplifies a persons capacity to help others, which is more profound rather than buying a new shirt with $200. On the other hand, in the later part of the text, Singers argument shifted from $200 to donating almost all of what is left afterward a family had spent for their necessities. He cited that an American households one-year income is $50,000, and the annual expenses would be $30,000. Therefore, the average $20,000 left must be donated to charity. Singers persuasion in donating had lost its point when he asked for every person to donate all their e xtra wealth. In a personal level, when Singers argument headed on this direction, it became less persuasive because first, it became unfair. For one, donating the money of what is left after spending for necessities is unfair for the person who had worked hard to earn that money. It is by far saying that a person must work hard in order to save the lives of other people and not think of themselves. Yes, the notion is realistic especially in seeing the statistics of death due to poverty. However, it is also necessary to office that an earning person must reward herself or himself every once in awhile. This reward can be as luxurious as having a canvas or as easy as getting massage. Aside from this, it is also beneficial for people to save for themselves. These savings will be essential especially in unavoidable and unexpected circumstances. This is not to say that a person must only think of the lives of the people they love, but this is saying that a person must be realistic enoug h to prepare for certain circumstances. The persuasiveness of Singers article was shaken when he injected the argument on plentiful all that is left to others. The text lost its point and eventually, in a personal level, became illogical to follow. For an average person to donate $200 is acceptable. Donating all the wastefulness money and wealth is already questionable. It is a fact that poverty must be combated with the help of people who are capable of helping. A child victuals in poverty must be